Applied Materials

Base 50, components added, then compressed onto a 2-98 scale. The formula is published and identical on every page.

Trading sessions only, so each step is one market day against the one before it. Free history covers the last 30 days; scores are recorded after every US close.

At the Friday 28 August close, AMAT scored 21, 29th of the 34 names here, and only one input sat above the board's median for it: volatility at +3.3. The other five were at or below where the typical name on this board was reading, so the score rested on that one component rather than on broad agreement between them. Pulling the other way was momentum at -11.2 — the day's move against the previous close.

Across the 20 sessions recorded since 30 July, AMAT has scored between 15 and 72, and that 21 sits near the bottom of that range. Net across the window it is down 24 points, and the largest single-session move was a rise of 43 points on 17 August.

Figures, not reasons. Every number above is the formula's own output for Applied Materials or a score this site published on a named day; the score describes how the price behaved and has no view on why.

Posts on X carrying $AMAT, counted by this site directly against the X API over Thursday 27 August, retweets excluded. Weekdays only - weekend counts are collected but run around half a weekday across the whole board, so they are withheld rather than charted beside trading days.

This measures how much Applied Materials is being talked about, not whether the talk is positive. Across the whole board, post volume has no relationship with the direction of a day's move - the numbers are here. It sits beside the sentiment score rather than inside it. Full X mentions board →