CoreWeave

Base 50, components added, then compressed onto a 2-98 scale. The formula is published and identical on every page.

Trading sessions only, so each step is one market day against the one before it. Free history covers the last 30 days; scores are recorded after every US close.

At the Friday 28 August close, CRWV scored 28, 20th of the 34 names here. The two inputs furthest above the board's median that session — not simply the largest, which is what separates CRWV from any other name that had a good day — were volume at +4.4 and volatility at +3.8. Pulling the other way was momentum at -9.9 — the day's move against the previous close.

Across the 20 sessions recorded since 30 July, CRWV has scored between 25 and 82, and that 28 sits near the bottom of that range. Net across the window it is down 23 points, and the largest single-session move was a rise of 49 points on 3 August.

Figures, not reasons. Every number above is the formula's own output for CoreWeave or a score this site published on a named day; the score describes how the price behaved and has no view on why.

Posts on X carrying $CRWV, counted by this site directly against the X API over Thursday 27 August, retweets excluded. Weekdays only - weekend counts are collected but run around half a weekday across the whole board, so they are withheld rather than charted beside trading days.

This measures how much CoreWeave is being talked about, not whether the talk is positive. Across the whole board, post volume has no relationship with the direction of a day's move - the numbers are here. It sits beside the sentiment score rather than inside it. Full X mentions board →