TeraWulf

Base 50, components added, then compressed onto a 2-98 scale. The formula is published and identical on every page.

Trading sessions only, so each step is one market day against the one before it. Free history covers the last 30 days; scores are recorded after every US close.

At the Monday 19 October close, WULF scored 13, 28th of the 34 names here, and only one input sat above the board's median for it: relative strength at -6.6. The other five were at or below where the typical name on this board was reading, so the score rested on that one component rather than on broad agreement between them. Pulling the other way was momentum at -11.3 — the day's move against the previous close.

Across the 15 sessions recorded since 21 September, WULF has scored between 9 and 62, and that 13 sits near the bottom of that range. Net across the window it is down 49 points, and the largest single-session move was a fall of 46 points on 16 October.

Figures, not reasons. Every number above is the formula's own output for TeraWulf or a score this site published on a named day; the score describes how the price behaved and has no view on why.