Marvell Technology

Base 50, components added, then compressed onto a 2-98 scale. The formula is published and identical on every page.

Trading sessions only, so each step is one market day against the one before it. Free history covers the last 30 days; scores are recorded after every US close.

At the Friday 28 August close, MRVL scored 9, 34th of the 34 names here, and not one of the six inputs sat above the board's median. The score was the sum of six unremarkable readings rather than anything pulling it in either direction — which is a finding about MRVL that session, not a gap in the data. Pulling the other way was momentum at -12.0 — the day's move against the previous close.

Across the 20 sessions recorded since 30 July, MRVL has scored between 9 and 86, and that 9 sits near the bottom of that range. Net across the window it is down 32 points, and the largest single-session move was a fall of 59 points on 28 August.

Figures, not reasons. Every number above is the formula's own output for Marvell Technology or a score this site published on a named day; the score describes how the price behaved and has no view on why.

Posts on X carrying $MRVL, counted by this site directly against the X API over Thursday 27 August, retweets excluded. Weekdays only - weekend counts are collected but run around half a weekday across the whole board, so they are withheld rather than charted beside trading days.

This measures how much Marvell Technology is being talked about, not whether the talk is positive. Across the whole board, post volume has no relationship with the direction of a day's move - the numbers are here. It sits beside the sentiment score rather than inside it. Full X mentions board →